The one task of the project is to create the new learning methods, education tools for teachers and to integrate them in lessons in order to improve the communication between Millennials, Post-Millennials and teachers, employers. The teachers biggest challenge is an effective use of the new methods in the learning process with students from these younger generations. It has now become an integral part of teachers job to keep up with the new teaching methods, education tools including ICT tools into the learning process. It is important to make learning exciting for learners with interactive activities and ICT use in the learning process. Doing so will require them to use technology while simultaneously fostering an active learning environment and staying updated on the modern learning approaches.

Lasma Balceraite, active learning method - „Explore Terminology” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Madara Petersone, explanatory illustrative study games:  “Story” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Madara Petersone, explanatory illustrative study games: “The end of word” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Sindija Dziedataja, associative cards ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Zaiga Kriķe, method: “Positive attitude towards subject” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Zaiga Kriķe, method: “Create interest about subject” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Laimrota Surska, method: acquaintance game -“Bingo” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Baiba Purlica, method: ”My value shield” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Baiba Purlica, method: ”I am” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Rebeka Grīnfelde, active learning method - „Smart Goal” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Rebeka Grīnfelde, active learning method - „MY SWOT” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Rebeka Grīnfelde, active learning method - „Learn to read” ENG, LV, BG, FI, SI;

Bryan Roberts, method – “Business knowledge through Restaurant Day” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Anna Roo and Seija Ruotsalainen, method – “Co-operative Open Learning (COOL)” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Jukka  Hakala, method – “Finding and delivering information in  groups” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Bryan  Roberts, method – “Getting motivated through promotion” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Seija Ruotsalainen ja Anna Roo, method– “Godparenting the elderly” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Bryan Roberts, method – “Group evaluation of customer service or sales of shops” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Anna Roo, method – “Using Padlet virtual wall in analyzing educative videos” ENG, FI, BG,  LV, SI;

Jukka  Hakala, method – “Pools on current affairs” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Juha Sonck, method – “Self-learning through the network” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI;

Seija Ruotsalainen, method – “Simulation pedagogy” ENG, FI, BG, LV, SI.

Denise Beltram, method – “Authentic problem solving” ENG , SI, BG, LV, FI;

Denise Beltram, Nives Čotar, method – “Digital monolingual dictionary” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

Edi Medvešček, method – “Cooperation with the economy” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

Aljaž Gec, method – “Learning by using innovative computer applications” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

Janko Harej, method – “Peer assessment in 3d printing” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

DRAŽEN GRBAC, method – “PERIPATETICS REVISITED” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

NIVES ČOTAR, method – “The strategy on how to use a printed, monolingual (English- English) dictionary” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

Tina Stanič, method – “How to properly dispose the waste” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

Ana Lenščak, method – “Debate-For and against” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI;

 Edi Medvešček, Ana Lenščak, method – “Learning with VR (Video Reality)” ENG, SI, BG, LV, FI.

Mariya Ivanova, method  - “Quizlet for learning vocabulary” ENG, BG, LV,  SI, FI;

Mariya Ivanova, method  - “Running dictation” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Siya Mihaylova, method  - “Circle stories – creative writing” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Siya Mihaylova, method  - “Tell a photo story using your smartphone in class” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Mitanka Todorova, method  - “Team hangman” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Mitanka Todorova, method  - “Kahoot” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Irena Vrazhitorova, method  - “Visual art and film in the classroom” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Biser Kirilov, method  - “Team competitions” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Galin Paskov, method  - “Speaking- ice breakers” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Desislava Tsokova, method  - “Learning apps in the classroom” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Zornitsa Staneva, method  - “Making one out of two” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI;

Zornitsa Staneva, method  - “Whose memory is it?! (a type of verbatim theatre)” ENG, BG, LV, SI, FI.

Every participating organization conducted survey in their country, after that the survey results were analyzed and compared among the partner countries. All partners discussed and presented results for teachers in schools to help them design methods and educational tools for teachers. There were 100-150 respondents from students and 30-50 respondents from teachers from each country. The surveys were used to identify the teacher and student needs concerning the teaching methodology.

BULGARIA: THE STUDENTS SURVEY; THE TEACHER SURVEY

FINLAND: THE STUDENTS SURVEY; THE TEACHER SURVEY

LATVIA: THE STUDENTS SURVEY; THE TEACHER SURVEY

SLOVENIA: THE STUDENTS SURVEY; THE TEACHER SURVEY

Results Survey for Students from secondary schools in Bulgaria, Finland, Latvia and Slovenia

Results Survey for Teachers – Bulgaria, Finland, Latvia and Slovenia

According with the objective of the project, 44 teaching and learning methods were created by trained teachers. After the creation of the teaching and learning methods, the next task was to test the created methods and to get a feedback from the students and teachers. In the previous Transnational project partner meeting in Bulgaria all project partners had chosen 11 methods to test. All methods were approbated on December, 2019 and on January, 2020.

See Testing of the methods in Slovenia,Testing of the methods in Latvia, Testing of the methods in Finland

See Results from the testing of methods developed under the project – feedback from Bulgaria, Finland, Latvia and Slovenia